Jürgen Göldenboog
Ein Bericht aus Essener Sicht könnt ihr hier lesen.
Hier jetzt aber der offizielle Endstand, durch Summierung aller Einzelergebnisse, bzw. Addierung der Brettpunkte beider Teilmannschaften:
1. Gelsenkirchen 54,5 (31,5+23)
2. Essen 50 (25,5+24,5)
3. Gladbeck 42,5 (23,5+19)
4. Oberhausen 29,5 (22,5+7)
5. Bottrop 23,5 (16+7,5)
Städtevergleich Emscher-Lippe 17. August 2014
|
Paarungsliste der 1. Runde
|
|||||||||||
|
PaarN
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
–
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
Ergebnis
|
At
|
||
|
1
|
1.
|
GE A
|
()
|
–
|
10.
|
GE B
|
()
|
–
|
|||
|
2
|
2.
|
OB A
|
()
|
–
|
9.
|
OB B
|
()
|
–
|
|||
|
3
|
3.
|
GLA A
|
()
|
–
|
8.
|
GLA B
|
()
|
–
|
|||
|
4
|
4.
|
BOT A
|
()
|
–
|
7.
|
BOT B
|
()
|
–
|
|||
|
5
|
5.
|
E A
|
()
|
–
|
6.
|
E B
|
()
|
–
|
|||
|
Paarungsliste der 2. Runde
|
|||||||||||
|
PaarN
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
–
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
Ergebnis
|
At
|
||
|
1
|
10.
|
GE B
|
(0)
|
–
|
6.
|
E B
|
(0)
|
0 – 5
|
|||
|
2
|
7.
|
BOT B
|
(0)
|
–
|
5.
|
E A
|
(0)
|
1 – 4
|
|||
|
3
|
8.
|
GLA B
|
(0)
|
–
|
4.
|
BOT A
|
(0)
|
2 – 3
|
|||
|
4
|
9.
|
OB B
|
(0)
|
–
|
3.
|
GLA A
|
(0)
|
0 – 5
|
|||
|
5
|
1.
|
GE A
|
(0)
|
–
|
2.
|
OB A
|
(0)
|
3 – 2
|
|||
|
Paarungsliste der 3. Runde
|
|||||||||||
|
PaarN
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
–
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
Ergebnis
|
At
|
||
|
1
|
2.
|
OB A
|
(2)
|
–
|
10.
|
GE B
|
(0)
|
1½ – 3½
|
|||
|
2
|
3.
|
GLA A
|
(5)
|
–
|
1.
|
GE A
|
(3)
|
½ – 4½
|
|||
|
3
|
4.
|
BOT A
|
(3)
|
–
|
9.
|
OB B
|
(0)
|
4 – 1
|
|||
|
4
|
5.
|
E A
|
(4)
|
–
|
8.
|
GLA B
|
(2)
|
4 – 1
|
|||
|
5
|
6.
|
E B
|
(5)
|
–
|
7.
|
BOT B
|
(1)
|
5 – 0
|
|||
|
Paarungsliste der 4. Runde
|
|||||||||||
|
PaarN
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
–
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
Ergebnis
|
At
|
||
|
1
|
10.
|
GE B
|
(3½)
|
–
|
7.
|
BOT B
|
(1)
|
4½ – ½
|
|||
|
2
|
8.
|
GLA B
|
(3)
|
–
|
6.
|
E B
|
(10)
|
3 – 2
|
|||
|
3
|
9.
|
OB B
|
(1)
|
–
|
5.
|
E A
|
(8)
|
1 – 4
|
|||
|
4
|
1.
|
GE A
|
(7½)
|
–
|
4.
|
BOT A
|
(7)
|
3½ – 1½
|
|||
|
5
|
2.
|
OB A
|
(3½)
|
–
|
3.
|
GLA A
|
(5½)
|
2½ – 2½
|
|||
|
Paarungsliste der 5. Runde
|
|||||||||||
|
PaarN
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
–
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
Ergebnis
|
At
|
||
|
1
|
3.
|
GLA A
|
(8)
|
–
|
10.
|
GE B
|
(8)
|
2 – 3
|
|||
|
2
|
4.
|
BOT A
|
(8½)
|
–
|
2.
|
OB A
|
(6)
|
½ – 4½
|
|||
|
3
|
5.
|
E A
|
(12)
|
–
|
1.
|
GE A
|
(11)
|
1½ – 3½
|
|||
|
4
|
6.
|
E B
|
(12)
|
–
|
9.
|
OB B
|
(2)
|
3½ – 1½
|
|||
|
5
|
7.
|
BOT B
|
(1½)
|
–
|
8.
|
GLA B
|
(6)
|
2½ – 2½
|
|||
|
Paarungsliste der 6. Runde
|
|||||||||||
|
PaarN
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
–
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
Ergebnis
|
At
|
||
|
1
|
10.
|
GE B
|
(11)
|
–
|
8.
|
GLA B
|
(8½)
|
1½ – 3½
|
|||
|
2
|
9.
|
OB B
|
(3½)
|
–
|
7.
|
BOT B
|
(4)
|
2 – 3
|
|||
|
3
|
1.
|
GE A
|
(14½)
|
–
|
6.
|
E B
|
(15½)
|
3½ – 1½
|
|||
|
4
|
2.
|
OB A
|
(10½)
|
–
|
5.
|
E A
|
(13½)
|
1 – 4
|
|||
|
5
|
3.
|
GLA A
|
(10)
|
–
|
4.
|
BOT A
|
(9)
|
4 – 1
|
|||
|
Paarungsliste der 7. Runde
|
|||||||||||
|
PaarN
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
–
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
Ergebnis
|
At
|
||
|
1
|
4.
|
BOT A
|
(10)
|
–
|
10.
|
GE B
|
(12½)
|
2 – 3
|
|||
|
2
|
5.
|
E A
|
(17½)
|
–
|
3.
|
GLA A
|
(14)
|
3 – 2
|
|||
|
3
|
6.
|
E B
|
(17)
|
–
|
2.
|
OB A
|
(11½)
|
2½ – 2½
|
|||
|
4
|
7.
|
BOT B
|
(7)
|
–
|
1.
|
GE A
|
(18)
|
0 – 5
|
|||
|
5
|
8.
|
GLA B
|
(12)
|
–
|
9.
|
OB B
|
(5½)
|
4 – 1
|
|||
|
Paarungsliste der 8. Runde
|
|||||||||||
|
PaarN
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
–
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
Ergebnis
|
At
|
||
|
1
|
10.
|
GE B
|
(15½)
|
–
|
9.
|
OB B
|
(6½)
|
4½ – ½
|
|||
|
2
|
1.
|
GE A
|
(23)
|
–
|
8.
|
GLA B
|
(16)
|
3½ – 1½
|
|||
|
3
|
2.
|
OB A
|
(14)
|
–
|
7.
|
BOT B
|
(7)
|
5 – 0
|
|||
|
4
|
3.
|
GLA A
|
(16)
|
–
|
6.
|
E B
|
(19½)
|
3 – 2
|
|||
|
5
|
4.
|
BOT A
|
(12)
|
–
|
5.
|
E A
|
(20½)
|
2 – 3
|
|||
|
Paarungsliste der 9. Runde
|
|||||||||||
|
PaarN
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
–
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
Punkte
|
Ergebnis
|
At
|
||
|
1
|
5.
|
E A
|
(23½)
|
–
|
10.
|
GE B
|
(20)
|
2 – 3
|
|||
|
2
|
6.
|
E B
|
(21½)
|
–
|
4.
|
BOT A
|
(14)
|
3 – 2
|
|||
|
3
|
7.
|
BOT B
|
(7)
|
–
|
3.
|
GLA A
|
(19)
|
½ – 4½
|
|||
|
4
|
8.
|
GLA B
|
(17½)
|
–
|
2.
|
OB A
|
(19)
|
1½ – 3½
|
|||
|
5
|
9.
|
OB B
|
(7)
|
–
|
1.
|
GE A
|
(26½)
|
0 – 5
|
|||
|
Mannschafts-Rangliste: Stand nach der 9. Runde
|
||||||||||||
|
Rang
|
MNr
|
Mannschaft
|
TWZ
|
At
|
S
|
R
|
V
|
Brt.Pkt.
|
RaLstg
|
RaDiff
|
||
|
Brett
|
TlnKen
|
Teilnehmer
|
TWZ
|
At
|
S
|
R
|
V
|
Punkte
|
SoBerg
|
Siege
|
||
|
1.
|
1.
|
GE A
|
1963
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
31.5 – 8.5
|
2009
|
134
|
|||
|
1.
|
Baerwolf,Steven
|
1905
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
5.5 – 2.5
|
17.00
|
4
|
||||
|
2.
|
Ahling,Michael
|
2154
|
6
|
1
|
1
|
6.5 – 1.5
|
22.50
|
6
|
||||
|
3.
|
Wolff,Christoph
|
2079
|
6
|
1
|
1
|
6.5 – 1.5
|
19.50
|
6
|
||||
|
4.
|
Becker,Marco
|
1993
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
8.0 – 0.0
|
26.00
|
8
|
||||
|
5.
|
Dönges,Dirk
|
1890
|
5
|
0
|
1
|
5.0 – 1.0
|
13.50
|
5
|
||||
|
6.
|
Karabügül,Okan
|
1757
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0.0 – 2.0
|
0.00
|
0
|
||||
|
2.
|
5.
|
E A
|
1991
|
6
|
0
|
2
|
25.5 – 14.
|
1976
|
-21
|
|||
|
1.
|
Rosen,Bernd
|
2337
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
6.0 – 2.0
|
17.50
|
5
|
||||
|
2.
|
Dahm,Bernd
|
2091
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
5.0 – 3.0
|
15.50
|
4
|
||||
|
3.
|
Prass,Marian
|
1909
|
W
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
6.0 – 2.0
|
17.25
|
5
|
|||
|
4.
|
Cavasin,Jörg
|
1903
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
4.0 – 4.0
|
10.50
|
3
|
||||
|
5.
|
Akcapinar,Yavuz
|
1717
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
4.5 – 3.5
|
10.75
|
4
|
||||
|
3.
|
6.
|
E B
|
2040
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
24.5 – 15.
|
1957
|
2
|
|||
|
1.
|
Villwock,Martin
|
2150
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
4.5 – 3.5
|
11.25
|
4
|
||||
|
2.
|
Müller-Closterman
|
2194
|
5
|
0
|
3
|
5.0 – 3.0
|
13.00
|
5
|
||||
|
3.
|
Klups,Christoph
|
2108
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
4.0 – 4.0
|
10.25
|
2
|
||||
|
4.
|
Dette,Jan
|
2038
|
6
|
0
|
2
|
6.0 – 2.0
|
18.00
|
6
|
||||
|
5.
|
Spingat,Dirk,Dr.
|
1709
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
5.0 – 3.0
|
10.75
|
4
|
||||
|
4.
|
3.
|
GLA A
|
2069
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
23.5 – 16.
|
1959
|
-37
|
|||
|
1.
|
Mancic,Ivan
|
2035
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2.5 – 2.5
|
10.50
|
2
|
||||
|
2.
|
Hassenrück,Helmut
|
2201
|
5
|
0
|
3
|
5.0 – 3.0
|
14.00
|
5
|
||||
|
3.
|
Frohne,Gerd
|
2161
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
5.0 – 3.0
|
14.50
|
4
|
||||
|
4.
|
Rickert,Stefan
|
2057
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
3.5 – 4.5
|
6.75
|
3
|
||||
|
5.
|
Nowok,Frank
|
1992
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
5.5 – 2.5
|
14.75
|
5
|
||||
|
6.
|
Winzbeck,Frank
|
1965
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
2.0 – 1.0
|
6.50
|
2
|
||||
|
5.
|
10.
|
GE B
|
2091
|
6
|
0
|
2
|
23.0 – 17.
|
1936
|
-63
|
|||
|
1.
|
Schütze,Andre
|
2119
|
4
|
0
|
4
|
4.0 – 4.0
|
11.50
|
4
|
||||
|
2.
|
Aulich,Marcell
|
2155
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
5.5 – 2.5
|
16.50
|
4
|
||||
|
3.
|
Buschmann,Andreas
|
2089
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
4.5 – 3.5
|
13.00
|
4
|
||||
|
4.
|
Arndt,Olaf
|
1997
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
4.5 – 3.5
|
12.25
|
4
|
||||
|
5.
|
Rydzewski,Klaus
|
2093
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
4.5 – 3.5
|
13.50
|
3
|
||||
|
6.
|
2.
|
OB A
|
1992
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
22.5 – 17.
|
1949
|
30
|
|||
|
1.
|
Kaufeld,Jürgen
|
2340
|
5
|
0
|
1
|
5.0 – 1.0
|
20.00
|
5
|
||||
|
2.
|
Krüger,Andre
|
2158
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
5.5 – 2.5
|
19.75
|
5
|
||||
|
3.
|
Raygrotzki,Norber
|
1907
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
3.5 – 3.5
|
11.00
|
3
|
||||
|
4.
|
Limberg,Martin
|
2120
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
5.5 – 2.5
|
19.75
|
5
|
||||
|
5.
|
Turp,Hüseyim
|
1680
|
1
|
0
|
5
|
1.0 – 5.0
|
2.00
|
1
|
||||
|
6.
|
Brock,Udo
|
1747
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2.0 – 3.0
|
4.25
|
1
|
||||
|
7.
|
8.
|
GLA B
|
1865
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
19.0 – 21.
|
1847
|
12
|
|||
|
1.
|
Winzbeck,Frank
|
1965
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
3.0 – 2.0
|
8.50
|
3
|
||||
|
2.
|
Holtkamp,Matthias
|
1902
|
3
|
0
|
5
|
3.0 – 5.0
|
9.00
|
3
|
||||
|
3.
|
Kruse,Peter
|
1968
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
4.0 – 4.0
|
11.25
|
3
|
||||
|
4.
|
Wenzel,Martin
|
1962
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
5.0 – 3.0
|
17.00
|
4
|
||||
|
5.
|
Busch,Udo
|
1764
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3.0 – 3.0
|
7.75
|
2
|
||||
|
6.
|
Plomann,Michael
|
1626
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
1.0 – 4.0
|
3.50
|
0
|
||||
|
8.
|
4.
|
BOT A
|
1981
|
2
|
0
|
6
|
16.0 – 24.
|
1834
|
-97
|
|||
|
1.
|
Hoffterheide,Thom
|
2030
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
3.5 – 4.5
|
10.25
|
3
|
||||
|
2.
|
Schüppel,Werner
|
1897
|
2
|
0
|
6
|
2.0 – 6.0
|
4.00
|
2
|
||||
|
3.
|
Masberg,Stefan,Dr
|
2099
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
2.5 – 5.5
|
8.00
|
2
|
||||
|
4.
|
Braun,Uwe
|
1841
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
2.5 – 5.5
|
6.25
|
2
|
||||
|
5.
|
Nowak,Steven
|
2039
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
5.5 – 2.5
|
16.75
|
4
|
||||
|
9.
|
7.
|
BOT B
|
1692
|
1
|
1
|
6
|
7.5 – 32.5
|
1596
|
-96
|
|||
|
1.
|
Langer,Raimund
|
1807
|
2
|
0
|
6
|
2.0 – 6.0
|
3.00
|
2
|
||||
|
2.
|
Gajda,Peter
|
1796
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
2.5 – 5.5
|
7.75
|
1
|
||||
|
3.
|
Große,Hans Georg
|
1534
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
0.0 – 8.0
|
0.00
|
0
|
||||
|
4.
|
Lange-Hegermann,B
|
1696
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
2.0 – 6.0
|
4.50
|
1
|
||||
|
5.
|
Droste,Anton
|
1626
|
1
|
0
|
7
|
1.0 – 7.0
|
3.00
|
1
|
||||
|
10.
|
9.
|
OB B
|
1686
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
7.0 – 33.0
|
1493
|
-105
|
|||
|
1.
|
Hibbeln,Christian
|
2042
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
0.0 – 8.0
|
0.00
|
0
|
||||
|
2.
|
Hufnagel,Markus
|
1719
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
0.0 – 8.0
|
0.00
|
0
|
||||
|
3.
|
Kyas,Jens
|
1202
|
1
|
1
|
6
|
1.5 – 6.5
|
2.00
|
1
|
||||
|
4.
|
Lobbenmeier,Stefa
|
1641
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
0.0 – 8.0
|
0.00
|
0
|
||||
|
5.
|
Bensch,Arnold Hei
|
1825
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
5.5 – 2.5
|
19.25
|
5
|
||||
Städtevergleich Emscher-Lippe
|
Mannschafts-Rangliste: Stand nach der 9. Runde
|
|||||||||
|
Rang
|
Mannschaft
|
TWZ
|
At
|
S
|
R
|
V
|
Brt.Pkt
|
RaLstg
|
RaDiff
|
|
1.
|
GE A
|
1963
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
31.5
|
2009
|
134
|
|
|
2.
|
E A
|
1991
|
6
|
0
|
2
|
25.5
|
1976
|
-21
|
|
|
3.
|
E B
|
2040
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
24.5
|
1957
|
2
|
|
|
4.
|
GLA A
|
2069
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
23.5
|
1959
|
-37
|
|
|
5.
|
GE B
|
2091
|
6
|
0
|
2
|
23.0
|
1936
|
-63
|
|
|
6.
|
OB A
|
1992
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
22.5
|
1949
|
30
|
|
|
7.
|
GLA B
|
1865
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
19.0
|
1847
|
12
|
|
|
8.
|
BOT A
|
1981
|
2
|
0
|
6
|
16.0
|
1834
|
-97
|
|
|
9.
|
BOT B
|
1692
|
1
|
1
|
6
|
7.5
|
1596
|
-96
|
|
|
10.
|
OB B
|
1686
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
7.0
|
1493
|
-105
|
|